Miguel Barbosa has posted his interview with James Montier here and here.  There are some gems in the interview that I agree with such as:

  • the dangers of irrelevant information
  • volatility is not a measure of a risk
  • the uselessness of pro forma earnings
  • mastering emotions is one of the most important things an investor can and should do

FJP

{ 0 comments }

With this post two years ago, I began publicly discussing my market timers and the relevant models.  It has been an interesting two years with lots of volatility in the markets. When I began blogging, the intent wasn’t to attract an audience but to become a better investor.  Having your investment decisions in the public domain for all to see can be a very humbling experience.  On the other hand, discussing your investment decisions has to make you a better investor because you have to back up your decisions in public and that is what makes one think through decisions more so than he might otherwise.

Let’s review the performance of my models over the past two years.

Canadian Leveraged Models

US Leveraged Models

US Non-Leveraged Models

Personally speaking, I think the returns are excellent but I’m biased!

Are there any caveats with my models? Of course there are – nobody can produce the consistent returns Bernie Madoff claimed to have made.  By definition, a trend following system will have drawdowns that will make the system’s followers wonder why they didn’t sell at higher levels.  If you apply tight stops to a trend following system the whipsaws will deteriorate the overall performance of the system.  You have to keep in mind, though, that the maximum drawdowns for my models are much less the the maximum drawdown experienced by a buy-and-hold investor.

Returns produced by my models are lumpy and the leveraging increases the “lumpiness”.  This characteristic of the models may make it difficult for some investors but when you look at the performance over a longer term, the end result is well worth it.

FJP

{ 2 comments }